Rubric+for+Presentation


 * =Rubric for VoiceThread Presentation =

=Rubric for Visual Presentation:= Visual Presentation Rubric ||
 * || Excellent  ||  Good  ||  Adequate  ||  Inadequate  ||
 * Organization || Presentation is sequential, logical and effectively conveys the meaning and purpose to the audience || Presentation is sequential, logical and audience understand the purpose || Presentation may not be sequential or logical but the audience understands the purpose || Presentation is not sequential or logical and it may be hard for the audience to understand the purpose ||
 * Knowledge || Presenters demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the content and provide valid and/or reasonable conclusions || Presenters demonstrate a firm grasp of the content and generalize reasonable conclusions || Presenters show a basic understanding of the content but do not develop reasonable conclusions || Presenters have only a basic understanding of the content and do not develop reasonable conclusions ||
 * Multimedia – Clarity || Graphics and content are easily viewed and identified from the audience seating || Most graphics and content are clear from the audience seating || The audience can identify graphics and content when pointed out || Many graphics and content are too small or unclear from the audience seating ||
 * Multimedia - Relevance || All graphics are related to the topic //and// make it easier to understand the presentation //and// support the presenters conclusions || All graphics and content are related to the topic and most make it easier to understand the presentation || Most graphics relate to the topic and presentation || Graphics do not directly relate to the topic OR detract from the presentation ||
 * Speaking Skills, Eye Contact || Presenter engages the audience, speaks clearly, makes frequent eye contact and //does not// read from slides or notes || Presenter engages the audience, speaks clearly, makes eye contact often, but relies on slides or notes || Presenter does not engage the audience //or// speaks in a low voice and reads from slides or directly from notes || Presenter does not engage the audience, doesn’t not speak clearly and reads directly from slides or notes ||
 * Visual Product || The presentation is engaging, effective, utilizes available technology effectively and is free of errors / bugs || The presentation is engaging, effective, utilizes available technology effectively but may have errors or bugs that detract from its effectiveness || The presentation may not be engaging or effective but utilizes available technology //but// has errors or bugs that detract from its effectiveness || The presentation is not engaging or effective //or// does not make use of available technology effectively //and// has errors or bugs that detract from its effectiveness ||
 * Resource Page, Works Cited || The document reflects wide ranging research (print and electronic), show use of reliable resources //and// has been formatted in MLA format and may be annotated || The document reflects adequate research (print and electronic) but relies heavily on electronic resources, some of which may be unreliable //and// has been formatted in MLA format || The document does not demonstrate adequate research, relies heavily on electronic resources, some of which may be unreliable //and// has been formatted in MLA format || The document does not demonstrate adequate research, all resources are electronic, some of which may be unreliable //and// has not been formatted in MLA format ||